Be There When It Happens
Test Security and Peer Review – Language for State Assessment RFPs
Test Fraud Threats
By David Foster
The Discrete Option Multiple Choice Test Item
An Important Evolution in Test and Item Design By David Foster Introduction The Discrete Option Multiple Choice question format (DOMC) may be one
Big Data Speaks Up for Test Security
By Dennis Maynes
Overcoming the Threats and Risks of Testing Internationally
By Dennis Maynes and Aimée Rhodes
The Language of Security and Test Security
By David Foster Introduction Let me begin this paper with a story. When a few colleagues and I began Caveon in 2003, it was the only area of
Standards for Online Proctoring
By David Foster
Weathering the Perfect Test Security Storm
By Jennifer Miller, Data Forensics Coordinator and Dennis Maynes, Chief Scientist
Security Threats to Online Proctoring
By David Foster
Online & Proctoring Systems Compared
By David Foster, Caveon Test Security and Harry Layman, The College Board
10 Years of Preventing and Detecting Cheating
By John Fremer, President, Caveon Consulting Services
Caveon Speaks Out on IT Exam Security: The Last Five Years
By Dennis Maynes
Combining Statistical Evidence for Increased Power in Detecting Cheating
By Dennis Maynes
Using Multiple Online Security Measures to Deliver Secure Exams to Test Takers
By Dr. David Foster and Nancy Mattoon KRYTERION, Inc. and Rick Shearer The Pennsylvania State University’s World Campus
Recent Innovations in Data Forensics
By Dennis Maynes
Defensibility of Caveon’s Statistics
By Dennis Maynes Overview This document reviews the standards and processes that are followed for producing a Data Forensics analysis. Caveon has
Legal Defensibility of Scoring Decisions
By Robert Hunt VP Client Legal Support & General Counsel, Caveon
Detecting Cheating in Computer Adaptive Tests Using Data Forensics
By James C. Impara, Gage Kingsbury, Dennis Maynes, and Cyndy Fitzgerald
The Tao of Test Aberrance
By Dennis Maynes What is Aberrance? “Aberrance”1 is a term used to describe something unusual about the way an examinee has responded to the test
